Dr. Jan E. Dormer, 2006, Nusantara Educational Institute
This is a selection of notes that were used for teachers' professional development sessions in East Java, Indonesia. The author is known, but the institute is not, and no copyright has been identified.
The handwritten notes were blanks that attenders filled in.
What it is: Control atmosphere and activities
What it is NOT: Controlling students
So ... what can you do to manage a classroom?
1. Arrange seating.
2. Create a relaxed and accepting atmosphere.
3. Ensure equality and respect among students.
4. Make sure you have all the supplies you need.
5. Control the focus and flow of the lesson.
6. Engage leamers through dialogue, challenging activities, and questions.
7. Provide extra material as needed.
8. Be prepared!
Discuss each of the classroom arrangements. Provide a quick sketch and consider the pros and cons of each.
Desks in rows | All same focus | Does not promote group work | |
---|---|---|---|
Desks in small groupings | Encourages conversation | Can get chaotic conversation | |
Desks in U-shape facing in | Large group equidistance |
Difficult for small groups Lot of space |
|
Desks along the side, facing the wall | Private study Can look over shoulder |
No communication | |
Teacher’s desk at front | Close, supplies | Not private conversation to give help | |
Teacher's desk at back | Safe place for conversation | No eye contact |
1. Why are classroom rules needed?
Safety, respect
2. Are rules needed equally in elementary school and high school? What are the differences?
Yes, students need to know what is expected of them.
High schoolers should have more self-control.
3. What are the relative merits of providing rules versus students creating them?
They'd accept the consequences more
Might make crazy rules
Choose 3-5 rules that you feel are important for the classroom. Fill out the chart below.
Rule | What age or grade is this appropriate for? | How does it foster learning? | What problems might it prevent? |
---|---|---|---|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ellie know that many students leam more in conversation with a knowledgeable mentor than any other way. Teachers should work to develop the skill of engaging in such instructional conversations with their students. Look at each teacher-student dialogue below.
Discuss the extent to which the conversation results in student learning, and what the teacher could do to make the conversation more effective.
1. Problem: The classroom is noisy.
Diagnostic questions:
learning noise:
Think of a specific noisy classroom
situation. What might work in that particular situation?
2. Problem: Students are out of their seats.
Diagnostic questions:
Think of a specific students out of seats
situation. What might work in that particular situation?
3. Problem: The students seem bored.
Diagnostic questions:
stillfor
bored.)
boredwhen really perhaps they mean they simply didn't enjoy a certain activity? (Some activities that students don't enjoy promote learning nevertheless!)
boring:
Think of a specific boredom
situation. What might work in that particular situation?
4. Problem: Group work isn't working
Diagnostic questions:
Think of a specific group work
problem. What might work in that particular situation?
The first step in diagnosing ANY classroom problem is to ask: Are the students engaged and Iearning?
Look for at least three of these signs:
1. The leamer is thinking about the content.
2. The learner is talking about the content.
3. The learner is asking questions about the content.
4. The learner is explaining the content to another learner.
5. The leamer is showing what she or he understands about the content.
6. The learner is NOT involved in busywork regarding the content.
7. The leamer is connecting the content to other parts of his or her life.
8. The learner is NOT frustrated with the topic.
9. The learner demonstrates a sense of accomplishment over understanding or mastery of the content.
1. Use the senses: Have students taste, smell or touch something.
2. Use visuals: Show a big poster or picture; talk about it, describe it, teach vocabulary.
3. Use drama: Act out a scene pertaining to the topic; make it as realistic as possible, using props, people outside the class, etc.
4. Use crafts: Have students make something pertaining to the topic.
5. Use music: Lyrics can pertain to the topic, or music can set the mood for an event.
6. Use opinion and debate: Students can express their thoughts on a topic, before doing further reading or listening on it.
7. Use experts: Have someone come to the class to present a talk or show something.
8. Use video: A T.V. clip or even a commercial could be a good introduction to a topic. Don't think of video simply as watching a prepared video or movie. Consider showing clips as short as five minutes, to generate discussion or make a point.
Evaluation: A general term used in different ways by different authors. Used today as an overall concept of testing or assessing student learning.
Assessment: A term that is contrasted with testing. Involves monitoring student learning (like testing) but also making decisions about future learning. Often used for new approaches such as “authentic assessment”, self-assessment”, and "portfolio assessment.”
Testing: Refers to traditional, single-event evaluations, whether written or oral. Usually initiated and carried out by the teacher, with limited or no student contribution to the process.
Diagnostic: Testing for the purpose of choosing a course of study, program, or special assistance.
Placement: A form of diagnostic testing used solely for placing students in appropriate courses or levels.
Formative: Evaluation (whether test or assessment) for the purpose of improving student learning and skill. In other words, evaluation which helps the learner.
Summative: A test or other procedure which provides an end result, usually for the purpose of providing a grade or some other documentation for the school or course.
Normative: A test which compares a student to the "norm". This type of test shows where a student rates in comparison to other students.
Qualitative: An evaluation involving a judgment regarding quality as in the use of a rating scale. Usually subjective.
Quantitative: An evaluation involving a numerical score of correct and incorrect responses. Usually objective.