Ross Woods, 2019
Teacher observation is a system for teachers to observe other teachers and learn from them.
Motivators for creating such a program come in various kinds. Consider the following:
At the beginning of a teacher observation program, teachers tend to be apprehensive about being observed by other teachers; they fear being judged or that others are checking up on you.
A solution is to start by carefully selecting the teachers who will be observed; make it voluntary and ask those least likely to feel threatened.
Give the impression of learning, not judging. You can give various assurances: It’s about the data, not about you as a person.
It is not about passing judgement and is non-evaluative.
Its purpose is to broaden teachers' viewpoints peer-to-peer.
If you make the initial experience purposeful, positive, and productive for observers and the observed, it will be easier to build it into an ongoing strategy. The longer term goal is to build a culture where teachers normally collaborate to help each other improve by reflecting on the practice of others, and getting feedback on their own practices. In such an environment, being observed is a normal part of the teachers’ role. Later on, teachers will feel better when they are accustomed to being observed, and it will be easier to get other teachers to be observed.
The first step in any approach is for people to meet and discuss the purpose. For example, a group of observers might want to solve a particular problem of practice. Discuss how and why they do what they do and their need. Each individual might set goals for aspects of teaching in which they feel a need to improve, although some people need a coach to help them identify their needs.
Then make a plan. Who will you observe? Which lessons will you observe? How many lessons? Will you incorporate any of the variations below? When will you do the debriefing?
An individual or a group goes to observe a lesson and collect observational data. Observers are quiet, non-intrusive, and take notes; they do not interrupt the class in any way. Their notes might include answers to questions such as What did I learn? How could I apply what I learned?
In other cases, especially where students are adults, observers might be more like participant observers; the teacher may ask observers to lead discussion groups or help in other ways.
Observation requires a debriefing to be beneficial. If observers are a group, each person shares their observations and then group members compare them, looking for themes and patterns. Group members might pose questions to prompt further development, or reflect on their own practices. The attitude is essential; people need to share their experiences, not report
them.
The next part of the debriefing is to plan improvements. The group might look for different ways of doing something and consider new ideas and strategies. Then make recommendations for future work.
In a school where teachers are afraid of being observed, just observe and don't give feedback. Observers learn through their own reflection.
An individual observer does the planning and debriefing in on-to-one meetings with a coach.
A small group of observers observes a teacher.
A video camera is unobtrusive and picks up things that are usually difficult to observe. Student reactions are also visible if the camera has a wide-angle lens.
The group gives a generalized report to the whole school in reference to school improvement.
Good intentions are easily lost. Does the school have way to systematically coach and monitor teachers to implement their intended improvements?
Reference
https://www.aitsl.edu.au/lead-develop/develop-others/classroom-observation/classroom-observation-strategies