© Ross Woods. This version Nov. 2009, rev. 2017
Crew Resource Management (CRM) is a set of principles and procedures designed to minimize human error in a team where errors could cause a crisis. In fact, some principles are especially useful when managing a crisis.
CRM originated from the study of air crashes, which found that human error was the biggest single factor causing crashes. Mistakes in communications resulted in people becoming unaware of their situation, breakdowns in teamwork, poor group decision-making, wrong decisions, and wrong series of decisions. Other signs of human errors were lack of leadership and poor management of tasks and resources.
Later, people noticed that CRM would be useful to reduce human error in other industries.
Good CRM practice has the following characteristics:
Team members need to communicate freely, openly, and unambiguously with each other, so they can provide necessary information at the appropriate time. For example, they might initiate a checklist or alert others to a developing problem.
Interpersonal communication is affected by various factors:
Good decisions minimize errors, while poor decisions can increase them. Poor decision making is a leading cause of errors, and each decision affects your future options.
The aspects of making a decision are usually as written below. They need to be seen holistically, because different decisions don't always follow the same steps or use the same order:
Several factors promote good decision making:
Specific skills:
The most controversial aspect of CRM that has been the "challenge and response" environment. In the past, the pilot was trained to give orders and subordinates were trained to take them without questioning. But in some cases, the subordinates had important information that would have resulted in a different order, had the pilot known, so the pilot made an error.
In good CRM practice, the subordinate respectfully and succinctly checks that the person in charge has the necessary information. In fact, some would say that they should speak up and persistently state their information until there is some clear resolution.
More conservative senior people didn't like the way that a direct order could be questioned, but this was largely a misunderstanding. The person in charge still has the right to make the decision and to give orders. The subordinate must still take the order, because he/she is often unaware of other information that the person in charge considers in the decision.
Here's how Wikipedia explained it:
Cockpit voice recordings of various air disasters tragically reveal first officers and flight engineers attempting to bring critical information to the captain's attention in an indirect and ineffective way. By the time the captain understood what was being said, it was too late to avert the disaster. A CRM expert named Todd Bishop developed a five-step assertive statement process that encompasses inquiry and advocacy steps:
These are difficult skills to master, as they require a change in interpersonal dynamics and organizational culture.
Assertiveness comes up as an important factor in the "challenge and response" environment, because staff need to communicate clearly. Passive people easily too chicken out when they should be putting a point across. It can take some effort for passive people to learn to express a message clearly, concisely and bluntly.
Assertiveness is being willing to actively state and maintain a position until shown that other options are better. It requires the initiative and the courage to act.
Some people can be too passive because they lack confidence, or fear reprisals if they speak up. Other causes are that the other person has a position of authority or much more experience.
People who are too aggressive create an unhelpful tension that can either distract attention from the message or create resistance to it. In fact, it's possible to display behavior as a continuum from passive to over-aggressive, with assertiveness in the middle:
Passive |
Assertive |
Over-aggressive |
Adapted from Naval Aviation Schools command website (www.netc.navy.mil)
Specific skills:
This topic includes interpersonal relationships and practices, group climate, and effective leadership/followership.
Recognize the symptoms and effects of stress and fatigue in yourself and in others, and their effects on performance. For example, take notice of "tunnel vision" and seek help from the team. If you see that a team member is not communicating, draw him/her back into the team. Look at these specific skills:
These skills relate to teams anticipating contingencies and the various actions that may be required. Excellent teams are always "ahead of the curve" and generally seem relaxed. They devote appropriate attention to required tasks and respond without undue delay to new developments. (They may engage in casual social conversation during periods of low workload and not necessarily diminish their vigilance.)
Keep aware of the operational environment and keep team members very aware of the situation. Good perception depends partly on accurate communication. Maintaining situational awareness means that you can perceive it accurately, without distortion caused by presumptions, distractions, lack of attention, boredom, stress or fatigue.
Consider practices that result in higher levels of situation awareness such as
These specific skills relate to time and workload management. They reflect how well the crew manages to prioritize tasks, share the workload, and avoid being distracted from essential activities.
Many team members are unfamiliar with the negative effects of stress and fatigue on their cognitive functions and team performance, especially in potential emergencies.
You might also want to learn more about:
We can't completely eliminate errors, so we need to learn ways of managing them. There are different models of error management, but I suggest the following questions as my model:
While individuals and even teams may perform well under many conditions, they are subject to the influence of at least four cultures:
Your CRM training needs to recognize and address these cultures to ensure they don't negatively affect team performance.
You may need to be very flexible if new information becomes available and you have to change your course of action.
One of the best techniques for training and reinforcing effective practices is to carefully debrief and analyze and critique what people did. They can be either real critical incidents or simulations, and times of either low or high workload.
It's essential that each team member can recognize good and bad communications, and effective and ineffective team behavior.
If you are the debriefing facilitator, lead the team through a self-critique of their own behavior and of their performance. At the end of the session, participants need to take away a strong sense of training accomplishment and learning.
It can be even more effective if you use video recordings of incidents during debriefing sessions. Select segments for discussion that show specific behaviors. (Erase recordings of simulations and classroom activities afterwards for privacy reasons.) Video recordings are especially compelling because they capture strengths and weaknesses and display them vividly to participants, who get to see themselves from a third-person perspective.
Specific hints:
Effective CRM begins in initial training; it is strengthened by recurrent practice and feedback; and it is sustained by continuing reinforcement that is part of the corporate culture and embedded in every stage of training.
Good training tends to use a range of learning activities:
You'll need to design your training to suit the kind of organization and its particular needs, so you should assess it. What do people already know about CRM? Do you need to survey people, analyze incident reports, or look at current procedures?
Get a commitment from all managers, starting with senior managers. It's basically good change management. Staff will accept a CRM program much more readily if they see that managers are supportive. The program might also need management support in other ways too, such as scheduled time for training, resources, and opportunity for CRM input when procedures are reviewed.
Manager support is especially necessary because supervisor can find CRM threatening. People in leadership sometimes feel threatened when subordinates question an order to check information (see below).
CRM should become an inseparable part of the organization’s safety culture. In particular, all levels of management need to support a culture that promotes appropriate questioning. Training and procedures should clearly encourage appropriate questioning and get the message through that there will be no negative repercussions for staff who appropriately question a decision of a superior.
Effective CRM training includes initial awareness. This is typically a series of classroom presentations that focus on communications and decision-making, interpersonal relations, team coordination, leadership, and adherence to standard operating procedures, among others. This develops and defines CRM concepts, and relates them to operational safety. It also gives staff a common conceptual framework and a common vocabulary for identifying team coordination problems.
Initial awareness training often comprises a combination of training methods, such as lectures, audiovisual presentations, discussion groups, role-playing exercises, computer-based instruction, and videotaped examples of good and poor team behavior. It normally requires a curriculum that addresses CRM skills, defines CRM concepts involved, and relate directly to operational issues that staff encounter.
Many organizations have found it useful to survey staff. Surveys have helped to identify embedded attitudes regarding team coordination and management, to identify operational problems, and to prioritize training issues. In turn, that understanding often has a favorable effect on individual attitudes regarding human factor issues. The training also frequently suggests more effective communication practices.
However, classroom instruction alone does not make fundamental long-term changes in staff attitudes. Awareness training is simply a necessary first step towards effective performance training.
Good CRM training always includes continual reinforcement, including recurrent practice and feedback. The reason is that introductory awareness doesn't make long-term behavioral changes. So include CRM as a regular part of your organization’s recurrent training.
It should contain classroom or briefing room refresher training to review and amplify CRM components, followed by practice and feedback exercises, improving skills and receiving feedback on their effectiveness. Feedback is most when it comes from self-critique and from peers, together with guidance from a facilitator with special training in assessment and debriefing techniques.
This version was based on "Crew Resource Management Training" Advisory circular no. 120-51E, dated 1/22/04 U.S Department of transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.
Some materials were adapted from the Naval Aviation Schools Command website e.g. https://www.netc.navy.mil/nascweb/crm/standmat/seven_skills/AS.htm
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crew_Resource_Management" as last modified on 14 Dec. 2008.
Other sources
Many aviation safety websites contain valuable materials that can be helpful in developing CRM training. Websites commonly link to other websites containing related material. Aviation-related websites maintained by U.S. Government agencies include the following:
See also "The Evolution of Crew Resource Management Training in Commercial Aviation" Robert L. Helmreich, Ashleigh C. Merritt & John A. Wilhelm http://www.fylrr.com/archives.php?doc=Pub235.pdf
Crew Resource Management (CRM) Training: Guidance For Flight Crew, CRM Instructors (CRMIS) and CRM Instructor-Examiners (CRMIES) This textbook was published by the Safety Regulation Group of the Civil Aviation Authority in the UK and is available at www.caa.co.uk. It is very good for summarizing CRM and adapting it to non-aircrew applications.